AALPD PD Quality Standards Feedback
From LiteracyTentWiki
Purpose
Provide feedback on the draft AALPD Professional Development Quality Standards.
Background
In 2006 the Association of Adult Literacy Professional Developers (AALPD www.aalpd.org) identified the development of quality standards in professional development as a priority area. Over the last year, an AALPD committee formed to research and draft a set of professional development standards. These standards, in conjunction with the AALPD policies http://aalpd.org/priorities_pdpolicies.htm, are designed to enhance professional development systems at the state and local levels. For more information, visit: http://www.aalpd.org/priorities_pdstandards.htm
Feedback Process
The draft PD standards were discussed on the Adult Literacy Professional Development List and revised based on those discussions (most recent version (3.20.08) is below).
The AALPD wants your continued feedback on this draft. By May 30, 2008, please provide your feedback by either:
- (a) entering it on this Wiki page: Commenting on PD Quality Standards OR
- (b) emailing it to Renee Sherman at: rsherman@air.org
After June 30, 2008, AALPD will finalize the draft standards and the final version will go to AALPD membership for an up or down vote.
The final version will be published on the AALPD and the NAEPDC Web sites and distributed to states as a resource others may use or adapt for designing and delivering quality professional development
| [edit] StandardsProfessional development that continually improves the instruction and learning for all adult learners: | [edit] Sample Indicators |
|---|---|
| 1. Deepens practitioners’ knowledge of content areas, instructional strategies, and assessment strategies based on research and professional wisdom to help learners meet their goals. |
(a) Offerings support standards-based education |
| 2. Prepares practitioners to create supportive learning environments and hold high expectations for all learners. |
(a) PD planning takes into account the principles of universal design |
| 3. Uses data from multiple sources (e.g., needs assessment of practitioners, programs, teachers, and funders; student data) to determine adult learning priorities, monitor progress, and help sustain continuous improvement for programs and learners. |
(a) Identification of practitioner needs takes into account the perspectives of teachers and program leaders, state and program data, developments in research |
| 4. Uses multiple evaluation strategies to guide improvement and demonstrate its impact. |
(a) The state and local systems have formative evaluation processes to gauge how well the professional development is reaching and serving all practitioners |
| 5. Enhances practitioners’ abilities to evaluate and apply current research, theory, evidence-based practices, and professional wisdom. |
(a) The research base related to PD is made explicit |
| 6. Is well designed in that it takes place over time, uses teaching and learning strategies appropriate to the intended goals, and employs a variety of delivery approaches and methods. |
(a) Activities have clear goals and objectives |
| 7. Models theories of adult learning and development |
(a) PD activities have theory and application components
|
| 8. Fosters program, community, and state level collaboration. |
(a) PD activities address questions such as how to build and sustain community collaborations of service providers and other stakeholders
|
| 9. Builds learning communities that foster collaboration and peer learning among practitioners. |
(a) The professional development (PD) system includes opportunities for ongoing learning through participating in online discussions, webinars and courses, adding to PD wiki areas, contributing work to on-line collections, presenting to peers, writing for newsletters and journals etc.
|
| 10. Requires leadership at the state and local levels that promotes effective professional development and fosters continuous instructional improvement. |
(a) Leadership positions such as lead teacher, program director, professional development provider, state director of adult education and other leadership positions are identified and individuals who are interested in pursuing, or who are in those positions, are provided with the training they need to fill those positions
|
| 11. Provides policies and guidelines to support practitioners in accessing and benefiting from quality professional development. |
(a) Staff are supported by:
(b) Regular staff meetings are held to enable practitioners to share in decision making for their program
|
Developed by:
Evelyn Beaulieu, Center for Adult Literacy and Learning
Andy Nash, World Education
David Rosen, Newsome Associates
Kirsten Schaetzel, Center for Applied Linguistics
Renee Sherman, American Institutes for Research
Beverly Wilson, Arizona Department of Education
Resources/Tools
Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Published: Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.
National Staff Development Council Standards. Available: http://www.nsdc.org/standards/index.cfm
Sherman, R., Dobbins, D., Tibbetts, J., Crocker, J., & Dlott, M. (2002). Professional development coordinator competencies and sample indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Building Professional Development Partnership Project (Pro0Net) American Institutes for Research. Available: http://www.calpro-online.org/pubs/pdccsiiaep_73.pdf
Sherman, R., Tibbetts, J., Dobbins, D., & Weidler, D. (2001). Management competencies and sample indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project (Pro-Net) Pelavin Research Institute. Available: http://www.calpro-online.org/pubs/mgmt_comp_samp_ind_63.pdf
Sherman, R., Tibbetts, J., Wooodruff, D., & Weidler, D. (1999). Instructor competencies and performance indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project (Pro-Net) Pelavin Research Institute. Available: http://www.calpro-online.org/pubs/Instructor%20competencies%20and%20indicators%20(C.pdf
