AALPD PD Quality Standards Feedback

From LiteracyTentWiki


Purpose

Provide feedback on the draft AALPD Professional Development Quality Standards.

Background

In 2006 the Association of Adult Literacy Professional Developers (AALPD www.aalpd.org) identified the development of quality standards in professional development as a priority area. Over the last year, an AALPD committee formed to research and draft a set of professional development standards. These standards, in conjunction with the AALPD policies http://aalpd.org/priorities_pdpolicies.htm, are designed to enhance professional development systems at the state and local levels. For more information, visit: http://www.aalpd.org/priorities_pdstandards.htm

Feedback Process

The draft PD standards were discussed on the Adult Literacy Professional Development List and revised based on those discussions (most recent version (3.20.08) is below).

The AALPD wants your continued feedback on this draft. By May 30, 2008, please provide your feedback by either:

(a) entering it on this Wiki page: Commenting on PD Quality Standards OR
(b) emailing it to Renee Sherman at: rsherman@air.org

After June 30, 2008, AALPD will finalize the draft standards and the final version will go to AALPD membership for an up or down vote.

The final version will be published on the AALPD and the NAEPDC Web sites and distributed to states as a resource others may use or adapt for designing and delivering quality professional development


Standards


Professional development that continually improves the instruction and learning for all adult learners:

Sample Indicators



1. Deepens practitioners’ knowledge of content areas, instructional strategies, and assessment strategies based on research and professional wisdom to help learners meet their goals.

(a) Offerings support standards-based education

(b) Uses various types of classroom assessment appropriate to learners

(c) Provides opportunities for reflective practice

(d) Prepares instructors to address new content through varied teaching strategies

(e) Uses instructional and professional materials that reflect research and professional wisdom and offer evidenced-based content instruction

2. Prepares practitioners to create supportive learning environments and hold high expectations for all learners.

(a) PD planning takes into account the principles of universal design

(b) PD providers are trained in the principles of universal design

(c) PD planning takes into account the diversity of the professional development population including issues related to gender, ethnicity, race, poverty, first language, and disabilities

(d) PD providers use differentiated instruction to meet the needs of all learners

3. Uses data from multiple sources (e.g., needs assessment of practitioners, programs, teachers, and funders; student data) to determine adult learning priorities, monitor progress, and help sustain continuous improvement for programs and learners.

(a) Identification of practitioner needs takes into account the perspectives of teachers and program leaders, state and program data, developments in research

(b) Needs are identified through a variety of needs assessments methods (needs surveys, PD evaluations, program data, etc.)

(c) The system uses teacher data to plan appropriate offerings

(d) Individuals have PD plans that are related to program improvement plans (which are linked to state priorities and requirements)

(e) PD offerings are aligned with students’ programs and state education agency’s goals

4. Uses multiple evaluation strategies to guide improvement and demonstrate its impact.

(a) The state and local systems have formative evaluation processes to gauge how well the professional development is reaching and serving all practitioners

(b) Evaluative information is collected at different levels (e.g., participant satisfaction, participant learning, participant change in thinking or practices, and organizational impact) as identified in research

(c) As resources and conditions permit, the impact of the professional development on student learning is evaluated

5. Enhances practitioners’ abilities to evaluate and apply current research, theory, evidence-based practices, and professional wisdom.

(a) The research base related to PD is made explicit

(b) There are specific learning activities designed to help practitioners understand how to find and use research

(c) Practitioners are encouraged to examine research critically

(d) Practitioners are given opportunities to apply research to their own practice

(e) Practitioners are given opportunities to research their practice

6. Is well designed in that it takes place over time, uses teaching and learning strategies appropriate to the intended goals, and employs a variety of delivery approaches and methods.

(a) Activities have clear goals and objectives

(b) Practitioner learning/instruction takes place over weeks or months

(c) The PD includes opportunities for application of new learning

(d) PD is available in varied formats such as: face-to-face and online workshops, courses, study groups, sharing groups, university-based classes, self-study, technical assistance, program-based work, etc.

(e) The system offers a variety of activities designed to build the technological comfort and competence of practitioners

7. Models theories of adult learning and development

(a) PD activities have theory and application components

(b) PD activities build on participants’ prior knowledge

(c) PD activities foster motivation and build confidence of participants

(d) PD activities promote active learning, a spirit of inquiry, and reflection


8. Fosters program, community, and state level collaboration.

(a) PD activities address questions such as how to build and sustain community collaborations of service providers and other stakeholders

(b) PD activities include training in community planning processes and team-building


9. Builds learning communities that foster collaboration and peer learning among practitioners.

(a) The professional development (PD) system includes opportunities for ongoing learning through participating in online discussions, webinars and courses, adding to PD wiki areas, contributing work to on-line collections, presenting to peers, writing for newsletters and journals etc.

(b) PD offerings provide opportunities to build the capacity of program teams to work collaboratively on program improvement (e.g., curriculum development projects, program evaluation projects, content standards development, building resource collections)


10. Requires leadership at the state and local levels that promotes effective professional development and fosters continuous instructional improvement.

(a) Leadership positions such as lead teacher, program director, professional development provider, state director of adult education and other leadership positions are identified and individuals who are interested in pursuing, or who are in those positions, are provided with the training they need to fill those positions

(b) Leaders solicit input from practitioners regarding PD priorities

(c) Leaders coordinate efforts and facilitate communication across national, state, and local levels

(d) Leaders guide the alignment of student, program, and state goals

(e) Leadership strengths and needs are identified with a variety of tools


11. Provides policies and guidelines to support practitioners in accessing and benefiting from quality professional development.

(a) Staff are supported by:

i. paid professional development time
ii. paid substitutes to allow for participation
iii. paid planning time for instruction

(b) Regular staff meetings are held to enable practitioners to share in decision making for their program

(c) Time is provided for practitioners to develop a professional development plan, access professional development that supports the plan, and receive supportive monitoring by supervisors NOTE: See the AALPD Professional Development Policy Recommendations and the Policy Matrix with research rationale and examples from practice.



Developed by:

Evelyn Beaulieu, Center for Adult Literacy and Learning
Andy Nash, World Education
David Rosen, Newsome Associates
Kirsten Schaetzel, Center for Applied Linguistics
Renee Sherman, American Institutes for Research
Beverly Wilson, Arizona Department of Education


Resources/Tools

Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Published: Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.

National Staff Development Council Standards. Available: http://www.nsdc.org/standards/index.cfm

Sherman, R., Dobbins, D., Tibbetts, J., Crocker, J., & Dlott, M. (2002). Professional development coordinator competencies and sample indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Building Professional Development Partnership Project (Pro0Net) American Institutes for Research. Available: http://www.calpro-online.org/pubs/pdccsiiaep_73.pdf

Sherman, R., Tibbetts, J., Dobbins, D., & Weidler, D. (2001). Management competencies and sample indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project (Pro-Net) Pelavin Research Institute. Available: http://www.calpro-online.org/pubs/mgmt_comp_samp_ind_63.pdf

Sherman, R., Tibbetts, J., Wooodruff, D., & Weidler, D. (1999). Instructor competencies and performance indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project (Pro-Net) Pelavin Research Institute. Available: http://www.calpro-online.org/pubs/Instructor%20competencies%20and%20indicators%20(C.pdf