EbaeExploratoryResearch

From LiteracyTentWiki

Need for More Exploratory Research

We need more exploratory research and discussion up front to determine the appropriate outcomes for further investigation. [Message 12, Part One]

From John Comings “This paper is a starting point, not a final plan, and so when we identified the groups, we constructed categories that were big and easy to describe. Once a system like this started, the number of groups could grow. Still, a lot could be learned within the large groups that would be applicable to most if not all, subsequent student groups. This research would make the case that instructional groups in programs should be made up of students who fall into defined categories, rather than multi-level groups. This would require greater funding. If members of the list think this approach will not work, can they suggest an alternative? Could anyone suggest a different set of groups? I think groups 1 (beginning ESOL students literate in their native language) and 3 (ASE students with higher level literacy and math skills) are good groups for the start of this line of research. These students come to our programs in significant numbers, we know a lot about how to serve them, and we have good outcome measures for them. Which groups do members of the list feel might be best for the beginning of this line of research?” [Message 13, Part One]