Specific Methodological Questions (6)

From LiteracyTentWiki

For the most part, questions are presented as they were written at the Meeting of Minds Symposium. This means that some might not be clear. If you were a participant and see one of your own questions in a form that doesn't capture what you were asking, please feel free to edit the question.

To respond to the questions, use the edit function of the wiki. To add a new question, use a single *. To add a comment, use **. Using this notation creates the following structure:

Topic

• Question
  • Comment

When citing research that has been done on the question, please try to include as full a reference as possible.

Specific Methodological Questions

G1. How do you increase sight word fluency for adults with language based learning differences?

G2. Are GED content area (reading, writing, math) classes more effective in preparing students than the multi-skill, multi-level instruction provided in many ABE programs?

G3. Which way to present adult literacy works best: through life-skills curriculum or straight academics (reading, writing, math, etc.)? Any pure research data on this?

G4. What makes learning centers effective in assisting adult learners achieve their educational goals?

G5. [What is the] effectiveness of one-to-one instruction?

• Too long, expensive and without multiple participation.
• Learning in small group is most effective. One-to-one instruction may be useful for learners who have difficulty with learning in small or a large group---One-to-one instruction is effective when used as supplement/reinforcement of what being taught in class.

G6. [How do we improve] comprehension for low-level readers with limited background information?